Our website uses cookies to give you the best experience and for us to analyse our site usage. If you continue to use our site, we will take it you are OK about this. Click on More for information about the cookies on our site and what you can do to opt out.

We respect your Do Not Track preference.

Making more use of AISAs Colin Trotter
17 October 2017


Four years ago, there was a change to the Privacy Act to reflect a change in the Government’s information sharing framework. The Government made the change in response to recommendations by the Law Commission, as part of the commission’s review of New Zealand’s privacy law.

Part 9A of the Privacy Act now provides a mechanism for government agencies to develop approved information sharing agreements (AISAs). AISAs are a way for government agencies to share information, within defined parameters, with the intention of delivering better public services.

Use of the AISA information sharing framework started slowly. Only four agreements were approved between 2013 and 2016. The most significant of these was the 2015 agreement between six parties to improve the well-being of vulnerable children by agencies working in a coordinated and collaborative way.


But during 2017, the number of AISAs has effectively doubled. Three more have been approved and a fourth, the Gang Intelligence Centre agreement, is in its final stages.

Of the new AISAs to become active, the most significant is the Inland Revenue / Ministry of Social Development agreement which took effect in August this year. This AISA supports public service delivery by the accurate and efficient assessment of tax obligations, and assessing any entitlement to benefits and subsidies.

The use of this single umbrella agreement replaces five information matching programmes and three other information sharing arrangements. The Inland Revenue / Ministry of Social Development AISA reduces the administrative burden of managing multiple agreements and it gives flexibility to deliver additional joined-up services without requiring further legislative changes - but only if those changes are unlikely to have an effect on the privacy implications set out in the agreement.

In comparison, the agreements which AISAs replace were based on a ‘point-to-point’ approach, with very tightly defined purposes - offering little or no ability to adjust scope.

If you want to know more about AISAs and our office’s oversight, see our ‘An A to Z of AISAs’ guidance and undertake our AISA online learning module.

Image credit: Ivory-billed woodpecker via John James Audubon's Birds of America





No one has commented on this page yet.

Post your comment

The aim of the Office of Privacy Commissioner’s blog is to provide a space for people to interact with the content posted. We reserve the right to moderate all comments. We will not publish any content that is abusive, defamatory or is obviously commercial. We ask for your email address so that we can contact you if necessary to clarify your comment. Please be respectful of authors and others leaving comments.