Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
You can search for case notes either by using the date filter below, or by using the free text search on our website. The free text search box displays in the top right hand corner of your desktop window. For mobile devices, you can access the free text search box from the menu icon (the three horizontal lines) on the top right corner of your device screen.
A man applied to join Police. His application was declined on the basis that he had been given diversion for a charge against him some years previously.
A life assurance company, in consultation with a couple, prepared a financial report which contained detailed personal information about the couple and family.
The complainant asked me to investigate the decision by the Police Commissioner to refuse the complainant access to photographs used in evidence at his trial.
An employee's union complained the employer had installed a video camera in the locker room at one of its plants, and that the employee had been videoed.
The complainant was a patient of a health agency. To treat him, his medical file was made available to the agency's clinical director of mental health.
A woman complained on behalf of her daughter-in-law (the patient) that a health agency disclosed health information to the police, breaching patient privacy.
