CA525/2021 [2023] NZCA 163: Landmark privacy case from the Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal has released its unanimous decision about Police photography during a random traffic stop.
Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
We respect your Do Not Track preference.
The Privacy Commissioner sometimes intervenes in a court case if the case involves issues that are relevant to privacy, or if it could impact how privacy laws are interpreted and applied. “Intervening” means that the Privacy Commissioner makes submissions (provides information or a perspective) to the Court as an independent expert in privacy.
These are some examples of cases where the Commissioner has intervened to help serve the public interest.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
The Court of Appeal has released its unanimous decision about Police photography during a random traffic stop.
The Privacy Commissioner intervened in judicial review proceedings in relation to the disclosure of Māori vaccination information.
The High Court’s decision on the proceedings brought by Rt Hon Winston Peters is a welcome and useful addition to the case law on the tort of privacy.
The Human Rights Review Tribunal found that the Crown had interfered with Kim Dotcom’s privacy in declining the multiple, near identical, Privacy Act requests.